Don’t Be A Milo

From the time of Caesar, and likely before, politics has been a family affair. It is quite likely that you vote for candidates from the same political party as your parents. Decade after decade, families have voted Republican or Democrat, depending on how their parents had voted and their parents before them.

But America’s melting pot culture brings about changes. This occurred in my own family. My father, James Chester O’Leary, was a staunch Democrat, a descendant of Irish Catholics from Rhode Island. My mother, Martha Hathaway Whitaker, was a descendant of New England’s aristocracy. She was rightly proud of her seventh great-grandfather, William Bradford, one of the founders of the Pilgrim bastion at Plymouth Rock and its first governor. Her family consistently voted Republican.

My parents married in 1937 and lived in Norton, Massachusetts, with my mother’s grandfather, Milo Rockwood Whitaker. Born in 1857, Milo was an old man and needed caregivers. By all accounts, Milo was delightful and revered by his neighbors, children, and grandchildren. He died in 1946, the year before my birth, so I never had the good fortune to know him. But we have many pictures of him; as you can see, he was a good-looking, seemingly kind-hearted man. He was notoriously Republican, a party formed just three years before Milo’s birth. (Before becoming Republicans, the Whitakers likely were members of the Whig party.) Practical, conservative, and fiscally responsible, that defines the Whitakers of the late 19th century and throughout most of the 20th century as well.

In 1944, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was running for an unprecedented fourth term as president of the United States. Roosevelt had led the nation out of the Great Depression and was now leading it in the fight against fascism in World War II. There was a definite sense of “don’t rock the boat.” However, most of the country also felt that Roosevelt had done well. Roosevelt is the first president for whom we have archival popularity polls, and his rating was an astonishing 70% just before World War II. That level of national support doesn’t come from just one party. Roosevelt had earned the respect of Democrats and Republicans, including Milo.

According to accounts, my father and Milo would often engage in political talk, and my father knew that my great-grandfather admired Roosevelt and his leadership. So, in 1944, as Roosevelt campaigned against Thomas Dewey, my father asked Milo if he would vote for Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Milo thought for a moment and then said, “Chet, if God was running as a Democrat and the devil as a Republican, I’d have to vote for the devil.”

My father told the story countless times during my youth, and I suppose it’s not surprising that I would remember it in this extraordinary election of 2024. It seems to me we have many Milos in this country—individuals who have voted Republican all of their lives and now are compelled to vote for the devil. What else could possibly explain the enduring allegiance that some people obviously have towards Donald J. Trump?

But is it allegiance to Trump or the Grand Old Party? I suspect it is the latter. I read once that loyalty to Trump was like loyalty to a constantly losing baseball team. There is no rhyme or reason, only loyalty, and loyalty is usually an admirable trait. But loyalty can also be perverted, twisted, and tormented into a shape that barely resembles what it once was. Today’s GOP would be unrecognizable to Milo. It is scarcely recognizable to some present-day members. Some, like Liz Cheney and John Kelly, have bravely broken rank and are attempting to rally their fellow members to vote Democrat. As the Republican former Lt. Governor of Georgia said at the Democratic convention, voting for Harris doesn’t make you a Democrat; it makes you a “Patriot.”

If Milo were alive today, I like to think he would agree and would be preparing to cast his first vote for a Democrat, perhaps with trembling hands but with the clear understanding that his beloved political party has been the victim of a hostile takeover. It has devolved into a cult, a dangerous vehicle for a deranged man.

But, sadly, I can’t be sure of that because there are so many people who still seem bent on electing America’s first fascist dictator.

Yes. It is that serious.

So, to those who are preparing to cast their vote for a convicted felon who has broken every one of the Ten Commandments, I issue a plea: don’t be a Milo. Do not vote for the devil. ❧

Plain and Simple: Tim Walz

There is so much about Tim Walz that is likable, but in this writer’s opinion, it all comes down to this: the man is plain and simple. 

Some may find that insulting. These words can undoubtedly be used disparagingly. But take a moment to research their true meanings, and I think you will agree with me. Governor Walz is not a complicated man; he might just be brilliant.

During the initial news coverage about Governor Walz, I thought of Harry Truman, the haberdasher from Missouri who ended up the 33rd President of the United States. Say what you will about Truman; he was indicative of the “plain” Americans who have occupied the highest offices of the land. You might not think of Lyndon Johnson as a “plain” American but, like Walz, he was a high school teacher before getting elected to the House of Representatives in 1937. From there, Johnson would catapult to the Senate and then the vice presidency, and then, through tragedy, to the presidency.  Several years later we had a peanut farmer, Jimmy Carter, as president. He was a plain American from Plains, Ga. 

These three presidents from the 20th century shared another feature with Walz: none was a lawyer. In fact, Tim Walz is the first non-lawyer since Jimmy Carter to grace the Democratic ticket!

I learned this fascinating fact in a recent Slate article  written by Dahlia Lithwick. She makes the case that having a non-lawyer on the team occupying the White House may help the country in many ways, perhaps none as important as convincing the country that changes to the Supreme Court are needed. She writes, “In a year in which the Democrats are putting the Supreme Court on the ballot, that makes [Walz] perfectly positioned to talk about what the court has done to ordinary Americans and why it matters.”  

Lithwick makes an excellent case for the need for reform of, as she calls it, the “imperial” Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court supermajority represents a democracy crisis that needs to be discussed at barbecues and high school lunch tables, not just pondered in the stacks at Ivy League law schools,” she writes. Walz, she concludes, is perfectly positioned for such a discussion. “Let’s have a conversation on court reform from someone who has lived, and taught and governed, under the hand of a court that seems not to care about the real impacts of its decisions.”

The current Supreme Court is an embarrassment, starting with the longest-serving justice — Clarence Thomas—to the Trump-trio of Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett. Lithwick maintains the conservative majority “sees itself as floating above all law and regulation.”  No wonder they could see their way towards granting Donald Trump absolute immunity. For this reason, Lithwick writes, “finally having a nonlawyer on the ticket to speak to what the court has done to ordinary Americans in these few short years is both vital and long overdue.”

For those who think changing the number of justices on the Supreme Court is Constitutional heresy, it will interest you to know that throughout the country’s history, the court has fluctuated from as few as five (John Adams, president) to as many as 10 (Abraham Lincoln, president). The Constitution is silent about a specific number, and rightly so. Needs change, and populations do, too. In 1865, when the court had ten justices, the U.S. population was around 31 million. Today’s population is more than ten times that number — 345 million! Logically, such an increase brings more legal entanglements, yet the Court operates with basically the same number of justices as our ancestors in the mid-19th century.

Plainly, changes are needed, and there would be something especially American if Tim Walz led the charge. It would be simply outstanding. ❧

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑